Teachers are similar to neighbors. Although there may be no blood ties, a bond exists between both parties due to friendship and familiarity built up through time. Often, one runs to them to lend their thoughts on daily school life or to borrow a cup of sugar. Despite the pettiness of the matter, they seldom turn away a request.
It is therefore no great revelation that many hold fond memories of their past educators. Perhaps it was due to extra attention paid to one struggling to cope with their reading skills in the formative years. As time passed, the student developed a love for reading and writing, thus polishing the skills and progressing into the ranks of a successful author. Others may lay claim to the guidance received for a science project whereby questions and problems were patiently responded to by a learned yet humble tutor. University teachers in the guise of professors also contribute to the betterment of society by casting an influence into the lives of those in their educational care.
These invaluable individuals’ role extends beyond the confines of basic teaching of knowledge. At the early years, young ones are tended to by these caretakers with the purpose of grooming them into polite and well-behaved children in preparation for formal schooling. Upon entry to primary and onwards to middle school, students come in contact with these guides who make a formidable effect upon their lives. New experiences, discipline, responsibility, peer pressure, insecurity, parental obligation, breakdown of the family unit and many more factors become intermeshed into the daily school life. Ambitions, life’s choices and mindsets are also shaped to get ready for advancement into higher levels of learning. In a nutshell, a teacher participates at various points of a child’s life for the purpose of coaching a generation of knowledgeable as well as functioning adults.
By: Chris Cornell
About the Author:
Filed under Business by on Nov 12th, 2010.
Also, is there a good way to actually MEASURE a society’s level of ’scientific progrees’?
By: Masternachos
About the Author:
Filed under Anthropology by on Nov 12th, 2010.
So what about women who don’t have kids? What would they say?
Child birth is not always a good thing. ****** had a mother.
By: Mike T
About the Author:
Filed under 5343 by on Nov 12th, 2010.
By: Fern Goozee
About the Author:
Filed under Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered by on Nov 12th, 2010.
I am supposed to pick one main focus for my paper, so which problem in our society do you think is the most prominent?
By: k-t(:
About the Author:
Filed under Other - Society & Culture by on Nov 12th, 2010.
There are two grave economic fallacies doing the rounds at the moment. They have been in play for as long as monetarism has been a word, but are now gaining a firmer and more worrying foothold than ever before. The first is that “there is no money” and the second that “there is no work”. If the recent bailout of the banks proved anything is that there is always money when you need it; and any local council, charity organisation or volunteer group will tell you that there is always work that needs to be done, sometimes desperately so. The real fact of the matter is that there is loads of work, but no one willing to pay for it.
Enter the solution: the Big Society. It all sounds great, individuals taking on more responsibility for community work in their own areas: we all become more empowered, the necessary jobs get done quicker and for less money. But power without money is an unpredictable and dangerous beast. I have no doubt that there are enough compassionate and enthusiastic people out there willing to give up their time to make their local environment a healthier, better place to live in and with no reward to themselves, but if Big Society isn’t funded properly, these willing volunteers are left without the means to complete tasks efficiently. Who will pay for premises, for training, for materials, and for the due processes of safe recruitment to occur?
A cynical mind might see in the Big Society a new return to slave labour. In defence, you might argue that slavery is only slavery if it is coerced, but good people who are not prepared to sit around and see their neighbourhoods go into moral and structural decline are effectively being coerced into action just as much as any Egyptian pyramid builder with a whip on his back. Add to this the current plans to give unemployed people placements, work without pay, to prepare them for “the real world of work”, and we see a disturbing trend forming.
The right wing mantra has always been “bosses get the highest possible profits, workers the lowest possible pay” and some will detect the perfect consummation of this economic doctrine in the Big Society. If we can get ordinary people to do those nasty jobs without pay that no self-respecting entrepreneur would ever want to invest in, the net result is lower public service costs which conveniently leaves more money for tax cuts for those in high paid employment. There is always money and there is always work. The question is are we happy to see the real work of society being done for nothing by good people, while corporate bosses continue to fleece the treasury? This is exploitation good and proper.
By: Milton Johanides
About the Author:
http://miltonjohanides.webs.com/
http://www.helium.com/users/510112/show_articles
Filed under Society by on Nov 12th, 2010.
I don’t need essays, just some ideas cuz to be honest i don’t quite get the topic! we are doing the poetry unit and this is the last piece of writting on the film
By: Miya miaow
About the Author:
Filed under Poetry by on Nov 12th, 2010.
By: Peter Pace
About the Author:
Filed under Other - Politics & Government by on Nov 12th, 2010.
By: ssyndrome
About the Author:
Filed under Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered by on Nov 12th, 2010.
By: gaurangalila2000
About the Author:
Filed under Other - Arts & Humanities by on Nov 12th, 2010.









